Dutch Q&A Provides Guidance on the Application of Pillar Two Minimum Tax Rules

On 2 September 2025 the Dutch Tax Authorities released a new Q&A document on the Minimum Tax Act 2024 (Wet minimumbelasting 2024). This act is the Dutch implementation of the OECD’s Pillar Two rules, designed to ensure a global minimum tax of 15 percent for multinational groups with revenues of at least 750 million euros.

The Q&A is non-binding and purely informative. It provides clarifications on how the new rules should be applied, but it does not create legally enforceable rights. The guidance will be updated over time and should be seen as a dynamic reference tool. For binding certainty, taxpayers must request a formal ruling through prior consultation.

Accounting standards and the top-up tax

A central issue is which accounting standards qualify as a basis for the calculation of the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT).

  • Dutch GAAP and IFRS-EU (IFRS as adopted by the EU) are both accepted.
  • IFRS issued by the IASB but not endorsed by the EU is not accepted.

This distinction is crucial for groups with mixed reporting frameworks. Where both Dutch GAAP and IFRS-EU are used by different Dutch entities, Dutch GAAP must be used to ensure consistency. From 2025 onwards, a tie-breaker rule will apply: each Dutch entity will use the reporting standard it normally applies. For 2024, a transitional OECD safe harbour allows reliance on IFRS-EU where available.

Earn-out obligations and excluded equity gains or losses

The Q&A also addresses earn-out obligations linked to acquisitions.

  • If the fair value of an earn-out changes after acquisition and this change is reflected in the accounts, it qualifies as an excluded equity gain or loss under Article 6.2 of the Wmb 2024.
  • This treatment applies unless the shareholding qualifies as a portfolio interest (less than 10 percent).

This is consistent with the OECD model rules and commentary.

International aspects and hybrid situations

The Q&A clarifies how Dutch rules interact with foreign regimes:

  • A reverse hybrid entity (transparent in the US but opaque in the Netherlands) will be considered a reverse hybrid for Dutch purposes.
  • GILTI and Subpart F income are regarded as standard controlled foreign company rules. No special allocation is required under Dutch Pillar Two.

Dividend taxes and allocation

Another clarification concerns dividend taxation. Covered taxes on dividends, including withholding tax, are allocated to the distributing entity, not to the receiving shareholder. This allocation directly impacts the effective tax rate calculation under Pillar Two.

Prior year corrections

Uncertainty remains around prior year adjustments made after the GloBE Information Return (GIR) has been filed. The Dutch authorities note that additional OECD administrative guidance is expected on this point.

Compliance and reporting obligations

Although no separate registration is required, the compliance burden is significant:

  • All in-scope groups must file a GloBE Information Return (GIR) electronically.
    • Filing deadline: 15 months after year-end, extended to 18 months for the first reporting year.
  • Where a top-up tax is due, a separate return must also be filed.
    • Filing deadline: 17 months after year-end, extended to 20 months for the first reporting year.
  • The safe-harbour regime does not remove the obligation to file a GIR.
  • Transfer pricing adjustments must be included, although small intra-group transactions below 35 million euros may be excluded from GIR reporting.

Broader context
The Minimum Tax Act 2024 came into force on 31 December 2023, introducing three mechanisms:

  • QDMTT (from 2024),
  • Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) (from 2024),
  • Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) (from 2025).

The Dutch legislation closely follows the EU directive and the OECD framework. It applies to large groups exceeding the 750 million euro threshold and ensures that each jurisdiction reaches the 15 percent minimum effective tax rate.

The government has confirmed that future OECD administrative guidance will be integrated into Dutch law, ensuring alignment with international practice.


Closing thoughts

The new Q&A is a valuable tool for multinationals, tax professionals, and investors navigating the first years of Pillar Two implementation in the Netherlands. It highlights practical challenges around accounting standards, earn-out obligations, and reporting requirements. At the same time, it reinforces that binding certainty can only be obtained through a ruling.

For groups operating in multiple jurisdictions, the Q&A shows how local details can significantly affect outcomes. The Dutch authorities’ approach underlines that the global minimum tax is not just a theoretical framework, but a complex compliance regime with real operational and financial consequences.

Need Expert Guidance on Transfer Pricing and Tax Strategy?

At TPA Global, we specialize in providing comprehensive transfer pricing solutions tailored to your business needs. Our team of experienced consultants can help you navigate complex tax disputes, ensure compliance with local and international regulations, and optimize your transfer pricing strategies to minimize risk and enhance profitability.

Whether you’re dealing with a transfer pricing audit, managing cross-border tax issues, or looking to streamline your transfer pricing documentation, we have the expertise to support you every step of the way.
Get in touch with our team here to learn how we can help you achieve your tax objectives with confidence.

To keep updated on news, visit our Global News Page.

Don’t miss our most recent updates and articles; follow us on LinkedIn.

Find out more about our Transfer Pricing Services.

Share on Social Media

Related articles

The Spanish Tax Agency (AEAT) is redefining how tax risk is assessed. The 2026 Tax Control Plan confirms a clear shift. Tax audits are becoming

In January 2026, the Czech Regional Court issued a significant ruling in Czech Republic v. Hitachi Astemo Czech s.r.o. (Case No. 15 Af 10/2023–128), addressing

In January 2026, Kenya’s Tax Appeals Tribunal delivered an important decision in the dispute between Del Monte Kenya Limited and the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA).