Colombia’s Supreme Administrative Court Rules on Inclusion of Loss-Making Comparables in Transfer Pricing Analysis

The Colombian Supreme Administrative Court has ruled in favor of a taxpayer regarding the inclusion of a loss-making entity in its transfer pricing comparability analysis. The decision clarifies that a single year of financial losses within a three-year analysis period does not warrant automatic exclusion of a comparable, provided that the losses are not recurrent. The ruling was issued in Providence 25803 on December 5, 2024, and subsequently published on February 4, 2025.


Key Takeaways

For multinational corporations operating in Colombia, this ruling provides additional clarity on how transfer pricing studies should be structured. Companies should consider the following key takeaways:

1. Losses Do Not Automatically Disqualify Comparables:

A single year of financial losses within a three-year period does not justify exclusion unless the losses are recurrent or indicate significant differences in economic circumstances.

2. Economic and Functional Comparability Matters:

The decision highlights the importance of analyzing the full operational context of a comparable, including its business functions, risks, and asset utilization.

3. Adjustments for Comparability Are Permissible:

Taxpayers can make reasonable adjustments to comparables to align them with the tested party, as permitted by both OECD guidelines and Colombian tax regulations.

4. Tax Authorities Must Provide Justified Exclusions

If DIAN or other tax authorities reject a comparable, they must substantiate their decision with an economic rationale rather than applying broad exclusion criteria.


Conclusion

The ruling in Providence 25803 sets an important precedent for transfer pricing in Colombia. It aligns local tax regulations with international best practices and provides greater certainty for taxpayers preparing transfer pricing studies. This decision underscores the necessity of an in-depth and methodical approach when selecting and justifying comparables, particularly in industries prone to financial fluctuations.

Going forward, tax professionals and multinational enterprises should ensure that their transfer pricing documentation is robust, well-supported, and aligned with the Court’s interpretation of comparability principles. The inclusion of loss-making comparables should be carefully analyzed within the specific context of each case, reinforcing a balanced approach to transfer pricing compliance in Colombia.

To keep updated on news, visit our Global News Page.

Don’t miss our most recent updates and articles; follow us on LinkedIn.

Find out more about our Transfer Pricing Services.

Share on Social Media

Related articles

Recent Pillar Two developments have provided multinational groups with some temporary relief through administrative simplifications and delayed reporting requirements. However, the direction remains clear. Global

The Spanish Tax Agency (AEAT) is redefining how tax risk is assessed. The 2026 Tax Control Plan confirms a clear shift. Tax audits are becoming

In January 2026, the Czech Regional Court issued a significant ruling in Czech Republic v. Hitachi Astemo Czech s.r.o. (Case No. 15 Af 10/2023–128), addressing