Global Tax Reforms: Pillar I, Amount B, and Their Impact on the Netherlands

Background of Pillar I and Pilar II 

The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework introduced a two-pillar tax reform to address the taxation of multinational enterprises (MNEs). Pillar I reallocates taxing rights, particularly for digital and remote businesses, ensuring countries where MNEs have significant economic activity can tax a portion of profits. Pillar II introduces a global minimum tax rate of 15% to curb tax competition.  

Amount B 

Within Pillar I, Amount B simplifies the allocation of profits to taxpayers who perform routine marketing and distribution activities. These taxpayers no longer need to conduct a full comparability analysis for routine activities, but can instead apply a fixed return on sales using a simplified approach. Pillar B is particularly aimed at countries with limited publicly available information or limited tax administration capacity, and the implementation is optional. 

Prevention of Double Taxation 

While the Netherlands will not implement Amount B for Dutch taxpayers that perform certain marketing and distribution activities in the Netherlands, the application of Amount B in a foreign country may lead to double taxation. The Dutch Staatssecretaris van Financiën issued a decree on 04 December 2024 (effective 01 January 2025), which outlines how the Netherlands will prevent this double taxation. It only relates to covered jurisdictions (countries which have implemented Amount B and have a bilateral tax treaty with the Netherlands, a list of which will be published by the OECD) and works as follows: 

  • If a covered jurisdiction applies Amount B correctly to a related transaction and there is a tax treaty between that jurisdiction and the Netherlands, the Dutch tax authorities will eliminate any resulting double taxation by making a corresponding adjustment. 
  • If a request for mutual agreement procedures is filed regarding the application of Amount B by a covered jurisdiction, the competent authorities will apply the corresponding adjustment process to resolve any potential double taxation. 
  • The Dutch tax authorities will not impose corrections related to the compensation for routine marketing and distribution activities in a covered jurisdiction, provided Amount B has been correctly applied in that jurisdiction. 

This applies to the profit allocation of group entities as well permanent establishments.  

Closing considerations: 

  • MNEs should map if Amount B applies to them in certain jurisdictions and if there are any mismatches on intercompany transactions 
  • While the Netherlands has issued this decree to prevent double taxation, other countries may not have similar legislation in place.  

Author: Igor Pinto, Senior Associate, TPA Global

To keep updated on news, visit our Global News Page.

Don’t miss our most recent updates and articles; follow us on LinkedIn.

Find out more about our Transfer Pricing Services.

Share on Social Media

Related articles

The Spanish Tax Agency (AEAT) is redefining how tax risk is assessed. The 2026 Tax Control Plan confirms a clear shift. Tax audits are becoming

In January 2026, the Czech Regional Court issued a significant ruling in Czech Republic v. Hitachi Astemo Czech s.r.o. (Case No. 15 Af 10/2023–128), addressing

In January 2026, Kenya’s Tax Appeals Tribunal delivered an important decision in the dispute between Del Monte Kenya Limited and the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA).